The judge heading the Air India inquiry is urging Canadian relatives of victims of the 1985 bombing to set aside any differences of opinion over “procedure,” saying the success of his investigation depends on their co-operation.
A split in the ranks of the Canadian families became apparent yesterday when Justice John Major noted a prominent advocate for calling the inquiry, Lata Pada of Mississauga, was absent, and is seeking standing at the inquiry as an individual, not as part of an association of about 67 Canadian families of victims.
“It would be unfortunate if personal disagreements … interfered with some of the families who have actively participated … withdrawing now,” Major said. “The disservice is to the commission.”
The root of the dispute is unclear. Pada could not be reached yesterday for comment, and others involved in the families’ association declined to speculate.
Justice John Major also indicated he would grant full standing to some 39 families living in India who were related to crew members or passengers on board the doomed Air India flight 182, saying they, too, “suffered the same loss.”
At yesterday’s hearing to determine who will participate in the inquiry’s fall hearings (with the right to cross-examine witnesses and make submissions), there was another prominent absence.
Ripudaman Singh Malik, one of two Vancouver residents acquitted last year of criminal charges in the 1985 bombing, also wants to be heard at the inquiry. He didn’t appear in person, but argued in a written brief he should have the right to ask Major to hear evidence behind closed doors if his reputation is likely to be tarnished.
Commission lawyer Mark Freiman, counsel to Major, said it’s “wildly premature” for anyone to anticipate a need for closed-door hearings. Major has the power to hear evidence on issues of national security matters in secret.
“It would be surprising for a public inquiry to go in-camera on matters that weren’t strictly necessary to be held in private,” Freiman said.